UAPDA Reveals: Human-Made AI Identified as Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)
Military Use of AI Sparks Debate Over Terms in the UAP Disclosure Act
Legal experts closely connected to the military-industrial complex are grappling with the definitions surrounding "non-human intelligence" (NHI), which, intriguingly, includes artificial intelligence (AI) developed by humans. These sophisticated AI systems are being leveraged to design and operate advanced strategic marine and aerospace technologies.
Given that AI qualifies as intelligence and is decidedly non-human, the broad term "NHI" is ripe for interpretation. This becomes especially potent in legal arenas, congressional sessions, and discussions steered by defense technology advocates. The ambiguity surrounding NHI could pose significant hurdles for the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA), potentially tripping up lawmakers and regulators more than anticipated.
In today’s fervent AI climate, revealing exotic materials—those originating beyond Earth’s historical technological capabilities—might actually draw less scrutiny than disclosing the military’s use of AI. This strategic implication of AI could very well tilt the scales of global power, making the NHI terminology a critical factor in policy discussions.
Adding another layer to this complexity, there are indications that counterintelligence efforts may be intentionally exploiting this broad definition of NHI to muddy the waters. For instance, consider a counterintelligence "whistleblower" in a media interview referring to "dead NHI pilots" instead of "bodies of pilots" recovered from crash sites. This could be a clever euphemism for describing a damaged AI avionics module, allowing the public to mistakenly infer that an extraterrestrial navigator was involved.
Similarly, the term "Neural Networks" might be obfuscated under the moniker "bio-logics," a play on the bio-inspired nature of these logical systems.
To bring clarity to this convoluted discourse, it might be more effective to adopt specific terms such as:
- Non-Human-Originated Technology (NHOT)
- Non-Human-Derived Intelligence (NHDI)
While the military applications of human-crafted AI—falling under the NHI category—should remain a focal point of concern, refining our terminology to NHOT and NHDI can aid in distinguishing truly anomalous phenomena from human advancements. This distinction is crucial as we navigate the complex landscape of AI and its implications for national and global security.
Conclusion
As AI continues to advance and integrate into strategic defense systems, the need for precise language becomes ever more critical. Clear and specific terminology can help policymakers, legal experts, and the public better understand the nuances of AI and its role in modern warfare, facilitating a more transparent and effective dialogue around these groundbreaking technologies.
